|
|||||||||||||
|
|
(e) estimate (f) forecast Comparative Economic Indicators - 2006
* 2007 estimate Credit and Collections
Credit and Payment Payment Facilities: Bank transfers are by far the most common means of payment. Bills of exchange and checks are not widely used, as they must meet a number of formal issuing requirements in order to be valid. For dishonored and protested bills and checks, creditors may resort to a fast-track procedure resulting in an injunction to pay.
One unique instrument available in Poland is the weksel in blanco. The signature on this document constitutes an irrevocable promise to pay and this undertaking is enforceable upon completion of the promissory note (amount, place and date of payment) in accordance with a prior agreement between issuer and beneficiary. They are widely used as they constitute a guarantee of payment in commercial agreements and the rescheduling of payments. Collections: It is best not to initiate legal action in Poland due to the cumbersome formalities, high costs, and lengthy time frames. (It takes almost two years to obtain a writ of execution). If possible, seek an amicable settlement based on a payment schedule drawn up by a public notary, which includes an enforcement clause. In the event of default, this instrument allows the creditor to move directly to the enforcement stage, subject to acknowledgement by the court of the binding nature of this document. Creditors may also seek an injunction to pay (nakaz zaplaty) via a fast-track procedure, provided they can produce positive proof of debt (like bills of exchange, checks or unpaid weksels in blanco, or other acknowledgements of debt.). If the judge is not convinced of the substance of the claim – a decision he alone is empowered to make – he may refer the case to full trial. Risk AssessmentCoface Country Risk Rating: A3 -- rating watchlisted with positive implications since June 2007. An already patchy payment record could be further worsened by a deteriorating political and economic environment. Nevertheless, the probability of a default is still acceptable. Ducroire Delcredere Political Risk Rating: 1 – Lowest risk Business ClimatePoland's entry into the EU in May 2004 was a milestone in the country’s political and economic transformation. The largest of the new accession countries in terms of size and population, it is also the biggest recipient of EU funds. With reasonably good economic growth, a young and well-educated labor force, and location at the crossroads between eastern and western Europe, Poland offers a large potential market in central Europe. Economic Freedom: According to the Index of Economic Freedom’s 2007 assessment, Poland's economy is 58.8% free, making it the world's 87th freest economy. Poland is ranked 35th out of 41 countries in the European region, and its overall score is much lower than the regional average. Poland scores well in trade freedom and monetary freedom. The average tariff rate is low, but non-tariff barriers include distortionary EU subsidies of agricultural and other goods. Inflation is also low. Poland has a fairly high top personal income tax rate, but its corporate rate is relatively low. Poland faces several economic challenges, as do other formerly Communist nations, but is progressing. Freedom from government, freedom from corruption, and labor freedom remain weak. The court system, though fairly reliable, is prone to inefficiency and sudden changes in laws or regulations. Foreign investment is generally welcome, but foreign ownership of companies in certain industries is limited. The financial sector, while subject to government interference, is well-regarded overall. Transparency of Regulatory System: The government acknowledges that its policies are not as transparent as they ought to be, and that bureaucratic requirements continue to impose a burden on investors. Reforms designed to deregulate, increase transparency, and promote competition have been introduced as part of the EU membership process, which will eventually make the Polish legal and financial framework more transparent. Recurring complaints of both domestic and foreign investors include regulatory unpredictability and a high level of administrative red tape. Intellectual Property Rights: In early 2000, Poland passed major new legislation, bringing the country into compliance with its obligations under the WTO TRIPS Agreement and membership in the European Union. However, piracy of intellectual property still remains a problem. Poland was placed on the US Trade Representative "Watch List" in 2005. Improved penal provisions and ongoing judicial reforms should help curb piracy. Poland continues to implement provisions to improve copyright and patent enforcement. Conversion and Transfer Policies: Poland provides full IMF Article VIII convertibility for current transactions, and the foreign exchange law fully conforms to the OECD Codes of Liberalization of Capital Movements and Current Invisible Operations. A new law has introduced a distinction between non-residents from EU countries and non-residents from third countries. It breaks the latter into not only non-EU countries, but also to non-OECD and non- European Economic Area (EEA) countries. Non-residents from the EU (as well as OECD and EEA) are treated with priority and currency transactions in their case are subject to more lenient provisions than currency transactions with non-residents from third countries. The foreign exchange law defines restrictions and obligations connected with transactions turnover in foreign exchange. Exceptions from those restrictions and obligations require a general (issued by the Minister of Finance in the form of a decree) or individual foreign exchange permit. Corruption: Polish laws and regulations provide a legal basis for combating corruption; however, corruption continues to be perceived as significant. Poland ranks 70th out of 158 countries in Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index for 2005. Political Violence: Poland is a politically stable country. There have been no confirmed incidents of politically motivated violence toward foreign investment projects in recent years. For more detailed information on these topics, visit the 2007 Investment Climate Statement – Poland, of the U.S. Department of State. Business and Cultural PracticesBusiness Cards: It is not necessary to have your business cards translated; an English version is acceptable. Business Attire: In small and medium-sized companies (excluding banks and consulting firms), executives wear casual, conservative clothes; in big companies, conservative suits and ties in subdued colors are the norm. Dress well, but modestly. Vivid colors are considered inappropriate. Names and Titles: There is no general rule as to how Polish people address each other. In initial contacts they may use the person's title. Just follow your hosts' example. Conversation: Maintain direct eye contact during conversations; Polish people are very sensitive to body language. Businesspeople like to conduct discussions on a wide range of topics including public life, family and career. Gifts: According to Polish business etiquette, gifts are given at the beginning of a relationship, especially when contacts are made for the first time, and at the end of a collaboration. The best gifts are always items which are typical of your culture, or a book describing your country or the region you are from. Appointments: Appointments should be made 4-5 days in advance; always confirm. Be punctual. Meetings and Negotiations: Polish negotiators tend to be reserved and taciturn. Be patient. In Poland, the decision-making process is slower than in North America. Be prepared to have several meetings before clinching a business deal. Acceptable Public Conduct: You should not speak with your hands in your pockets. Do not sit with your legs crossed. It is expected that men will hold doors for women. Do not perform physical labor on Sundays; Poland is 90% Catholic and Sunday is considered as a day of rest. For more detailed information on these topics, visit Poland, on the Executive Planet web site. Sources for further information on doing business in PolandA Guide to Doing Business in Poland (2006), Wardyñski & Partners - PDF Doing eBusiness in Poland, Global Technology Forum, Economist Intelligence Unit How to Do Business in Poland (2006), Deloitte American Embassy in Warsaw, Poland Embassy of the Republic of Poland, Washington, DC, USA Polish American Chamber of Commerce ***** Subscribe to the Credit-to-Cash Advisor This information is provided by ABC-Amega Inc. Providing international receivable management and debt collection services for exporters to more than 200 countries including Poland. For further information, contact info@abc-amega.com. This report represents a compilation of information from a wide variety of reputable sources. Risk Assessment information: Provided with permission by Coface Country Rating. Also Belgian credit insurance company Ducroire Delcredere Information on credit terms and the probability of prompt payment are provided, with permission, from Overseas Press and Consultants (OP&C) as published in IOMA's Report on "Managing Credit, Receivables & Collections," December 2007. |
|
© 2003-2010 ABC-Amega Inc. • Privacy Policy • Site Map editor@abc-amega.com • 1.716.885.4444 phone • 1.716.878.2842 fax |